Skip to content
MOTCHECK
Beta

DVSA Statistics

2003 Mitsubishi Pajero
MOT Pass Rate & Pre-MOT Checklist

Used 2003 Mitsubishi Pajeros usually pass their MOT, but around 1 in 4 still fail, most often for vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded and a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn. Based on 315 MOT tests from DVSA data, this page shows how this model performs and what to check before your test.

75.2%

Pass Rate

Based on 315 DVSA anonymised MOT tests · About this data

Pass Rate

75.2%

About average

Top Failure Reasons

Common MOT failures for this model

Parts Available

Professional Part

Brakes are a common wear item.

Fixes:Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded
Check Price on Amazon
Trusted RetailerAd / Affiliate Link
  1. 1

    Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced

    7.9%
  2. 2

    Brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded

    6.6%
  3. 3

    A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn

    6.1%
  4. 4

    Fluid leaking excessively and likely to harm the environment or to pose a safety risk to other road users

    5.7%
  5. 5

    Body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point

    5.1%

Based on DVSA statistics from 315 recorded tests.

Pre-MOT Checklist for 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero

Based on common failure points for this model, check these items before your MOT:

  • 1

    Test brakes for effectiveness, pull, and unusual noises when driving

    Brakes – Common fail on this model

  • 2

    Listen for knocks or clunks when driving over bumps - bounce each corner

    Suspension – Common fail on this model

Personal Check

Do you own this car?

Check your specific vehicle for outstanding advisories or recalls. Get a personalized risk report for your exact Mitsubishi Pajero.

GB

Enter the reg exactly as it appears on the plate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero likely to fail its MOT?

Based on DVSA statistics, the 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero has a 75.2% MOT pass rate. This is above average, indicating good reliability for a vehicle of this age.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero?

The most common MOT failure reasons for a 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero are: vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn. Many of these can be checked and fixed before your test to improve your chances of passing.

How can I reduce the chance my 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero fails its MOT?

To improve your chances of passing, check the items that commonly fail on this model: vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn. Use our pre-MOT checklist above to identify potential issues before your test. Many common failures are easy DIY fixes.

How many 2003 Mitsubishi Pajeros fail their MOT?

Around 25% of 2003 Mitsubishi Pajeros fail their MOT test, meaning roughly 1 in 4 don't pass first time. The most common reasons are vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced and brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded. Pre-checking these items can significantly improve your chances.

What should I check before my 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero MOT?

Before your 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero MOT, check these commonly-failed items: vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn. Most are visual checks you can do at home – look for worn tyres, test all lights work, and check for obvious damage or leaks.

Is the 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero reliable for MOT?

With a 75.2% MOT pass rate, the 2003 Mitsubishi Pajero performs above average compared to typical vehicles. This suggests good overall condition for a vehicle of this age.