Skip to content
MOTCHECK
Beta

DVSA Statistics

1988 Nissan Silvia
MOT Pass Rate & Pre-MOT Checklist

There isn't much MOT data yet for the 1988 Nissan Silvia (only 13 tests in our DVSA dataset), so these figures are a rough guide. We still highlight common failure items below so you can check before your MOT.

84.6%

Pass Rate

Based on 13 DVSA anonymised MOT tests · About this data

Pass Rate

84.6%

Higher than average

Limited data available for this model; results may be less representative.

Top Failure Reasons

Common MOT failures for this model

Parts Available

Professional Part

Worn tyres are a safety issue and common MOT fail.

Fixes:Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
Check Price on Amazon
Trusted RetailerAd / Affiliate Link
  1. 1

    A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn

    22.2%
  2. 2

    Steering linkage retaining or locking device missing or ineffective

    11.1%
  3. 3

    Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements

    11.1%
  4. 4

    Power steering fluid leaking or system malfunctioning

    5.6%
  5. 5

    A mandatory tell-tale for direction indicators missing or inoperative

    5.6%

Based on DVSA statistics from 13 recorded tests.

Pre-MOT Checklist for 1988 Nissan Silvia

Based on common failure points for this model, check these items before your MOT:

  • 1

    Listen for knocks or clunks when driving over bumps - bounce each corner

    Suspension – Common fail on this model

  • 2

    Check for excessive play in steering wheel - should be minimal free movement

    Steering – Common fail on this model

  • 3

    Check tyre tread depth is at least 1.6mm across the central 3/4 of the tyre

    Tyres – Common fail on this model

  • 4

    Test all indicators flash at the correct rate - check front, rear, and side repeaters

    Lighting – Common fail on this model

Personal Check

Do you own this car?

Check your specific vehicle for outstanding advisories or recalls. Get a personalized risk report for your exact Nissan Silvia.

GB

Enter the reg exactly as it appears on the plate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a 1988 Nissan Silvia likely to fail its MOT?

Based on DVSA statistics, the 1988 Nissan Silvia has a 84.6% MOT pass rate. This is above average, indicating good reliability for a vehicle of this age.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 1988 Nissan Silvia?

The most common MOT failure reasons for a 1988 Nissan Silvia are: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, steering linkage retaining or locking device missing or ineffective, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements. Many of these can be checked and fixed before your test to improve your chances of passing.

How can I reduce the chance my 1988 Nissan Silvia fails its MOT?

To improve your chances of passing, check the items that commonly fail on this model: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, steering linkage retaining or locking device missing or ineffective, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements. Use our pre-MOT checklist above to identify potential issues before your test. Many common failures are easy DIY fixes.

How many 1988 Nissan Silvias fail their MOT?

Around 15% of 1988 Nissan Silvias fail their MOT test, meaning roughly 1 in 7 don't pass first time. The most common reasons are a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn and steering linkage retaining or locking device missing or ineffective. Pre-checking these items can significantly improve your chances.

What should I check before my 1988 Nissan Silvia MOT?

Before your 1988 Nissan Silvia MOT, check these commonly-failed items: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, steering linkage retaining or locking device missing or ineffective, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements. Most are visual checks you can do at home – look for worn tyres, test all lights work, and check for obvious damage or leaks.

Is the 1988 Nissan Silvia reliable for MOT?

With a 84.6% MOT pass rate, the 1988 Nissan Silvia performs above average compared to typical vehicles. This suggests good overall condition for a vehicle of this age.