Skip to content
MOTCHECK
Beta

DVSA Statistics

2002 Ford Explorer
MOT Pass Rate & Pre-MOT Checklist

There isn't much MOT data yet for the 2002 Ford Explorer (only 19 tests in our DVSA dataset), so these figures are a rough guide. We still highlight common failure items below so you can check before your MOT.

78.9%

Pass Rate

Based on 19 DVSA anonymised MOT tests · About this data

Pass Rate

78.9%

About average

Limited data available for this model; results may be less representative.

Top Failure Reasons

Common MOT failures for this model

Parts Available

Professional Part

Brakes are a common wear item.

Fixes:Brake disc or drum significantly and obviously worn
Check Price on Amazon
Trusted RetailerAd / Affiliate Link
  1. 1

    A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn

    7.9%
  2. 2

    A shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage

    7.9%
  3. 3

    Brake disc or drum significantly and obviously worn

    7.9%
  4. 4

    The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements

    7.9%
  5. 5

    Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake

    5.3%

Based on DVSA statistics from 19 recorded tests.

Pre-MOT Checklist for 2002 Ford Explorer

Based on common failure points for this model, check these items before your MOT:

  • 1

    Listen for knocks or clunks when driving over bumps - bounce each corner

    Suspension – Common fail on this model

  • 2

    Test brakes for effectiveness, pull, and unusual noises when driving

    Brakes – Common fail on this model

  • 3

    Test all headlights work and aim is correct - check for condensation inside

    Lighting – Common fail on this model

Personal Check

Do you own this car?

Check your specific vehicle for outstanding advisories or recalls. Get a personalized risk report for your exact Ford Explorer.

GB

Enter the reg exactly as it appears on the plate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a 2002 Ford Explorer likely to fail its MOT?

Based on DVSA statistics, the 2002 Ford Explorer has a 78.9% MOT pass rate. This is above average, indicating good reliability for a vehicle of this age.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2002 Ford Explorer?

The most common MOT failure reasons for a 2002 Ford Explorer are: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage, brake disc or drum significantly and obviously worn. Many of these can be checked and fixed before your test to improve your chances of passing.

How can I reduce the chance my 2002 Ford Explorer fails its MOT?

To improve your chances of passing, check the items that commonly fail on this model: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage, brake disc or drum significantly and obviously worn. Use our pre-MOT checklist above to identify potential issues before your test. Many common failures are easy DIY fixes.

How many 2002 Ford Explorers fail their MOT?

Around 21% of 2002 Ford Explorers fail their MOT test, meaning roughly 1 in 5 don't pass first time. The most common reasons are a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn and a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage. Pre-checking these items can significantly improve your chances.

What should I check before my 2002 Ford Explorer MOT?

Before your 2002 Ford Explorer MOT, check these commonly-failed items: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage, brake disc or drum significantly and obviously worn. Most are visual checks you can do at home – look for worn tyres, test all lights work, and check for obvious damage or leaks.

Is the 2002 Ford Explorer reliable for MOT?

With a 78.9% MOT pass rate, the 2002 Ford Explorer performs above average compared to typical vehicles. This suggests good overall condition for a vehicle of this age.