Skip to content
MOTCHECK
Beta

DVSA Statistics

1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto
MOT Pass Rate & Pre-MOT Checklist

There isn't much MOT data yet for the 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto (only 5 tests in our DVSA dataset), so these figures are a rough guide. We still highlight common failure items below so you can check before your MOT.

80%

Pass Rate

Based on 5 DVSA anonymised MOT tests · About this data

Pass Rate

80%

Higher than average

Limited data available for this model; results may be less representative.

Top Failure Reasons

Common MOT failures for this model

Quick DIY Fix

10 minutes fix
Save Money

Headlight bulbs are a common MOT fail. Easy DIY replacement.

Fixes:A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED
Check Price on Amazon
Trusted RetailerAd / Affiliate Link
  1. 1

    A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED

    33.3%
  2. 2

    Headlamp aim unable to be tested

    33.3%
  3. 3

    Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen

    33.3%

Based on DVSA statistics from 5 recorded tests.

Pre-MOT Checklist for 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto

Based on common failure points for this model, check these items before your MOT:

  • 1

    Test all headlights work and aim is correct - check for condensation inside

    Lighting – Common fail on this model

  • 2

    Check windscreen for chips or cracks in the driver view zone (Zone A)

    Visibility – Common fail on this model

Personal Check

Do you own this car?

Check your specific vehicle for outstanding advisories or recalls. Get a personalized risk report for your exact Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto.

GB

Enter the reg exactly as it appears on the plate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto likely to fail its MOT?

Based on DVSA statistics, the 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto has a 80% MOT pass rate. This is above average, indicating good reliability for a vehicle of this age.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto?

The most common MOT failure reasons for a 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto are: a headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than â½ not functioning in the case of led, headlamp aim unable to be tested, windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen. Many of these can be checked and fixed before your test to improve your chances of passing.

How can I reduce the chance my 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto fails its MOT?

To improve your chances of passing, check the items that commonly fail on this model: a headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than â½ not functioning in the case of led, headlamp aim unable to be tested, windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen. Use our pre-MOT checklist above to identify potential issues before your test. Many common failures are easy DIY fixes.

How many 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Autos fail their MOT?

Around 20% of 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Autos fail their MOT test, meaning roughly 1 in 5 don't pass first time. The most common reasons are a headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than â½ not functioning in the case of led and headlamp aim unable to be tested. Pre-checking these items can significantly improve your chances.

What should I check before my 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto MOT?

Before your 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto MOT, check these commonly-failed items: a headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than â½ not functioning in the case of led, headlamp aim unable to be tested, windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen. Most are visual checks you can do at home – look for worn tyres, test all lights work, and check for obvious damage or leaks.

Is the 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto reliable for MOT?

With a 80% MOT pass rate, the 1972 Jensen Interceptor Iii Auto performs above average compared to typical vehicles. This suggests good overall condition for a vehicle of this age.