Skip to content
MOTCHECK
Beta

DVSA Statistics

1966 Rover 2000
MOT Pass Rate & Pre-MOT Checklist

There isn't much MOT data yet for the 1966 Rover 2000 (only 6 tests in our DVSA dataset), so these figures are a rough guide. We still highlight common failure items below so you can check before your MOT.

66.7%

Pass Rate

Based on 6 DVSA anonymised MOT tests · About this data

Pass Rate

66.7%

About average

Limited data available for this model; results may be less representative.

Top Failure Reasons

Common MOT failures for this model

Parts Available

Professional Part

Brakes are a common wear item.

Fixes:Parking brake inoperative on one side
Check Price on Amazon
Trusted RetailerAd / Affiliate Link
  1. 1

    The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired

    33.3%
  2. 2

    Parking brake inoperative on one side

    33.3%
  3. 3

    Fuel system leaking excessively or a risk of fire

    33.3%

Based on DVSA statistics from 6 recorded tests.

Pre-MOT Checklist for 1966 Rover 2000

Based on common failure points for this model, check these items before your MOT:

  • 1

    Listen for knocks or clunks when driving over bumps - bounce each corner

    Suspension – Common fail on this model

  • 2

    Test brakes for effectiveness, pull, and unusual noises when driving

    Brakes – Common fail on this model

Personal Check

Do you own this car?

Check your specific vehicle for outstanding advisories or recalls. Get a personalized risk report for your exact Rover 2000.

GB

Enter the reg exactly as it appears on the plate.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a 1966 Rover 2000 likely to fail its MOT?

Based on DVSA statistics, the 1966 Rover 2000 has a 66.7% MOT pass rate. This is about average for vehicles of this age.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 1966 Rover 2000?

The most common MOT failure reasons for a 1966 Rover 2000 are: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, parking brake inoperative on one side, fuel system leaking excessively or a risk of fire. Many of these can be checked and fixed before your test to improve your chances of passing.

How can I reduce the chance my 1966 Rover 2000 fails its MOT?

To improve your chances of passing, check the items that commonly fail on this model: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, parking brake inoperative on one side, fuel system leaking excessively or a risk of fire. Use our pre-MOT checklist above to identify potential issues before your test. Many common failures are easy DIY fixes.

How many 1966 Rover 2000s fail their MOT?

Around 33% of 1966 Rover 2000s fail their MOT test, meaning roughly 1 in 3 don't pass first time. The most common reasons are the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired and parking brake inoperative on one side. Pre-checking these items can significantly improve your chances.

What should I check before my 1966 Rover 2000 MOT?

Before your 1966 Rover 2000 MOT, check these commonly-failed items: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, parking brake inoperative on one side, fuel system leaking excessively or a risk of fire. Most are visual checks you can do at home – look for worn tyres, test all lights work, and check for obvious damage or leaks.

Is the 1966 Rover 2000 reliable for MOT?

With a 66.7% MOT pass rate, the 1966 Rover 2000 performs about average compared to typical vehicles. This is typical performance for vehicles in this age bracket.